Episode 188
Talking Points Memo's small-boat strategy
Josh Marshall, founder of Talking Points Memo, has spent 25 years steering a small, independent newsroom through every shift in digital media. He discusses how TPM survived the traffic era, why it avoided venture capital, and what he calls the “small-boat strategy” — building for resilience, not scale.
Transcript
Welcome to the Rebooting Show.
Brian:I'm Brian Morrissey.
Brian:This episode is brought to you by Beehiiv.
Brian:When you are running a media business, email is usually the backbone,
Brian:or at least it increasingly is.
Brian:And getting it right is unfortunately usually harder than it should be.
Brian:that's where Beehiiv comes in.
Brian:This is a platform that was built by people who scaled morning brew to
Brian:millions of readers, and they created the platform that they wish they
Brian:had when they were in your shoes.
Brian:So it is no surprise that companies like TechCrunch Time and the
Brian:Texas Tribune are already running their newsletters on Beehiiv.
Brian:It is designed for serious media operators, not marketers, bolting
Brian:on a newsletter as an afterthought.
Brian:if you are running a publication with more than a hundred thousand subscribers.
Brian:Beehiiv is built for you.
Brian:Their team has scaled newsletters at places like the information
Brian:puck, and as I said, morning Brew.
Brian:so they understand the challenges that big publishers face, from
Brian:seamless migration to enterprise grade deliverability and monetization Beehiiv
Brian:makes it easy to grow, retain, and engage audiences at serious scale.
Brian:So if you wanna see what the next stage of growth for you could
Brian:look like, go to Beehiiv.com/trb.
Brian:That is spelled B-E-E-H-I-I-V.com/TRB and you can meet with, Beehiiv's team
Brian:of growth and newsletter experts today.
Brian:I wanna thank Beehiiv for their partnership.
Brian:They've been great partners.
Brian:and we're gonna continue this through next year.
Brian:So you'll be hearing more about Beehiiv.
Brian:I recently switched over to Beehiiv, so I do encourage you to check it out.
Brian:I've found the tools that they provide.
Brian:More powerful, than the ones that I had previously used.
Brian:And last week we actually partnered on a breakfast where we gathered
Brian:together a group of product and revenue leaders from leading publishers.
Brian:And I think the biggest thing that stood out to me is how much these
Brian:businesses, are in a time of change as they look to rebuild the direct
Brian:connections to their audience.
Brian:Now, the wrinkle to this.
Brian:Is that I found that many of these businesses still have to operate the
Brian:old traffic based model while they build the new audience focused model.
Brian:And that is a difficult, burden to, to bear.
Brian:And that's why I think in many cases, you know, newer, Newer
Brian:models have a leg up in that.
Brian:But I think that there are obviously still strengths, with, the more
Brian:legacy models that are adapting.
Brian:And it also echoed my conversation that I'd had with Josh Marshall,
Brian:the founder of Talking Points Memo.
Brian:Josh is one of the end Talking Points Memo, or one of the last
Brian:survivors of the blog year.
Brian:I mean, I remember that moment.
Brian:You know, in sites like Talking Points, memo, daily Costs, or
Brian:the Daily Dish, even Gawker.
Brian:You know, we're forerunners really of this shift from institutions to
Brian:individuals that we're seeing and has been branded as the creator
Brian:economy, more than two decades later.
Brian:TPM is celebrating its 25th anniversary, and you know, most of its peers from that
Brian:era have either faded away altogether.
Brian:Or become something unrecognizable as they've entered, what Troy calls the
Brian:harvesting phase of their lifecycles.
Brian:TPMS Mere existence is a profitable, stable business, deserves
Brian:some examination as to why.
Brian:And Josh was nice enough to, walk me through it.
Brian:You know, he credits.
Brian:The choice to forego any dreams of being the next media mogul and a critical
Brian:decision at the height of the traffic era to get off that treadmill and go down
Brian:what at the time was an uncommon path.
Brian:He watched his peers chase scale, you know, raising venture capital and hiring.
Brian:Giant newsrooms and he saw what he calls the original sin of digital media, and
Brian:that is confusing the growth patterns of journalism with how technology scales.
Brian:So TPM made a bold choice in late 2013.
Brian:It would shift to an audience focused membership business.
Brian:It would still sell advertising, but the weight of its efforts would go to building
Brian:recurring revenue, turning its audience into customers rather than the product.
Brian:That Alignment gave the company critical ballast compared to more volatile ad
Brian:businesses that depended on the fickle traffic patterns, from tech platforms.
Brian:And today, TPM gets roughly 90% of its revenue from subscriptions.
Brian:It probably isn't the most scalable model, but it's far more reliable.
Brian:And most importantly, I think it gives TPM and and publishers that get on
Brian:this path, a degree of sovereignty that you simply do not have when you
Brian:depend on traffic from tech platforms that you're gonna then monetize.
Brian:Through an ad system that you mostly don't control.
Brian:So Josh looks at this as a pure practicality, which I
Brian:really appreciate personally.
Brian:'cause he describes himself as like a small business
Brian:owner, not as an entrepreneur.
Brian:And it's a distinction I greatly appreciate because the media,
Brian:businesses of today and tomorrow will increasingly look this way.
Brian:Also, I mostly have read Josh over the years for his political
Brian:writing, but what always struck me was how precisely he could write
Brian:about programmatic advertising.
Brian:It's something we discussed in this because he treated it
Brian:the way he treats politics.
Brian:You follow the incentives and you'll understand the system and
Brian:what he saw, and this was what led to that decision in late 2013.
Brian:Was that the system was designed really to fail publishers.
Brian:And so in this episode we talk about what it takes to survive 25 years in digital
Brian:media, what TPM got right about membership and what everyone else has missed about
Brian:monetization in the attention economy.
Brian:I hope you enjoyed this conversation I know I did.
Brian:if you do, please share it with someone.
Brian:and also leave a rating and review wherever you get your podcast.
Brian:Always like to hear your feedback.
Brian:My email is brian@therebooting.com.
Brian:Now here's my conversation with Josh.
Brian:Josh, welcome, to the podcast.
Brian:Congrats on 25 years.
Josh:Thank you.
Josh:Thank you.
Josh:And, and, thanks for having me.
Brian:I was joking before we got on that, like anyone in this business who has
Brian:been running a digital, media operation for 25 years is like the, the World
Brian:War II veterans that are like produced
Josh:Yep,
Brian:a year.
Brian:you've had, like, you've gone through a bunch of different, of these eras
Brian:and he started in the blogging era.
Brian:Right?
Brian:So I.
Josh:Yep.
Brian:I was like reminded, you know, with Curtis Lewa now being talked about
Brian:a lot, that, like people don't remember a lot of, a lot of things that came before.
Brian:And the blogging era was the forerunner.
Brian:it was a different time and we started obviously in 2000 and,
Brian:you know, blogs were a thing and.
Josh:Yeah, yeah, yeah.
Josh:No, they were, and, and, you know, one thing that, as I look back on it now, one
Josh:of the key things about the blogging era is that it was the pre-social media era.
Josh:and that was, that was so critical to it because, because, you
Josh:know, there were some aspects of.
Josh:blocking existed before, 2000 and 2001.
Josh:The political blogosphere as,
Josh:as something that was like a, you know, a, a number of different sites and kind
Josh:of had a, had a whole valence to it that was, a lot of, that was tied up
Josh:with the Bush administration, you know, and, and, and people wanting alternative
Josh:sources of news and stuff like that.
Josh:a lot of it is people.
Josh:I think people today have a hard time, even people who were.
Josh:Around then and operate in, in that context.
Josh:It's hard, it is hard to remember to put ourselves back in the framework of just
Josh:how hard it was to find information.
Josh:and that is one aspect of, of what blogging was about.
Josh:you know, alternative media, a more, a more informal kind of reader, engaged kind
Josh:of media, but also pre, pre-social media.
Josh:A lot of it was, you know, Finding out about news that the big, you know, the big
Josh:outlets weren't focused on, and that's not just a matter of, Wanting to hear
Josh:from people who had a different viewpoint.
Josh:Often it was, oh, you know, this story, this new story is happening in San
Josh:Diego, or it's happening in Des Moines.
Josh:And how do you find out about that?
Josh:Well, blogs because there was a lot of, you know, reader
Josh:engagement and stuff like that.
Josh:Often things like that would bubble up, in, in the blog world.
Josh:So it was a very, It was kind of a, you know, a, a, a crazy time and, and it was
Josh:just a very, very different environment than anything we have today in so many,
Josh:you know, in so many different ways.
Josh:Even though it was in the internet era,
Brian:Right.
Brian:Yeah.
Brian:And there's kind of, I mean we'll get to it, but there, there is like sort of
Brian:revival of that, I guess, and the energy around like substack and independent
Brian:voices, and I think some of that, everything comes back in fashion, right?
Brian:And a lot of the, a lot of the sort of things is being closer to, to
Brian:the audience, being more informal.
Brian:Like a lot of the things like Echo, right?
Brian:But the incentives are obviously very different in, in, in
Brian:this, in this environment.
Brian:and that's something that you've been part of for 25 years, which is responding
Brian:maybe against your will to the incentives of the systems in which media exists.
Josh:Well that, you know, that's one thing, and I, I've told people this.
Josh:Inside TPM at various stages of, of the company's history that there
Josh:is, you know, there are a lot of downsides to being a very small
Josh:company and a small organization, but there are also some plus sides to it.
Josh:And one of them is that you are never under the illusion
Josh:that you can buck the trends.
Josh:That are surrounding you.
Josh:You are a small boat on a big ocean, and you have to navigate that ocean.
Josh:And when you're really big, you can, you can fool yourself for a long time
Josh:and with a lot of money to burn, to thinking you are gonna buck the trends.
Josh:But when you're small, you know, you are not going to buck the trends.
Josh:You n you have to.
Josh:The ocean is the reality that you live in and you need to adapt
Josh:to that and navigate within it.
Josh:And so that can, if you are.
Josh:I think if people running media companies are, have their ears open for that,
Josh:that can give you a certain advantage.
Josh:I mean, maybe this is a way of, you know, repackaging deep disadvantages
Josh:as advantages, but you know, you have to take your advantages
Josh:where you, where you find them.
Josh:and that can allow you to be more reactive.
Josh:You know, I think about, know, some of the things that happened to even the big
Josh:operations, like, like the times and the posts say in the first decade of this
Josh:century, or that happened with a lot of the big, VC-backed, startup publications
Josh:in the second decade of, of this century.
Josh:And a lot of those problems were based on, or, or.
Josh:Exacerbated by thinking like, well, this is a challenge, but we're
Josh:gonna outsmart that challenge.
Josh:Well, no, you're not.
Josh:Right.
Josh:You're, you're not going to outsmart that challenge.
Josh:You're gonna need to react to it.
Josh:So yeah, that has been, something very basic, to us for forever and, you know,
Josh:that is, there's, I would say there's a number of decisions that, that we
Josh:made over the course of 25 years that.
Josh:We're very early and we saw things early, and we started doing things
Josh:very early because again, you're small,
Josh:you're not gonna, you're not gonna buck the trend.
Josh:And so for just, one thing that really jumps to mind to me because it has really
Josh:just shaped the arc of the last dozen years of our history is that, we started
Josh:a membership program at the end of 2012.
Josh:That was way before anybody else was doing it.
Josh:And actually there were things that I was looking at in 2011 and 2012 that made
Josh:me think like, this is not gonna work.
Josh:And not, not just like, it's not gonna work for us, but
Josh:the whole thing isn't working.
Josh:The whole scale,
Brian:The traffic era you're
Josh:The traffic era basically.
Josh:And, and the business underpinning of the traffic area with, with a certain kind of
Josh:ad monetization and so forth?
Brian:Often programmatic, which is indirect.
Josh:yes.
Josh:Both.
Josh:Yeah.
Josh:Programmatic.
Josh:Well, the growth of, it's a series of things.
Josh:One is, the concentration in what was, you know, we used to call direct
Josh:advertising, the increasing, the ways that programmatic was, being cut into by
Josh:the social platforms, and, and not just cut into beings like, you know, Borg by
Josh:the, by the, by the social platforms.
Josh:and I remember I was, we actually the actual launch of our membership program.
Josh:Was was very shambling because I, I, I got this idea in like the middle of 2012
Josh:and I was like, we gotta, I, I have to launch this before the election because
Josh:if you're in the political news business
Josh:that the, an election is when you have a, you know, a lot of audience.
Josh:and so I sort.
Josh:Did everything I possibly could, and a lot of things I wasn't able
Josh:to do to get the thing launched before, before the election in 2012.
Josh:In any case, you know, it took us, it took us another, year or two before we
Josh:had things lined up in a way that we could really start building that, you
Josh:know, building that subscription business like around early 2014 and so forth.
Josh:But.
Josh:When, when the crisis really hit, which I would say was sort of 20 17, 20 18,
Josh:we already had like 20,000 subscribers.
Josh:so we were in a position to not, not that it was easy, it was, it was
Josh:still desperate, but we were in a position to nav to, to survive that.
Josh:And that's one of the, you know, that's one of the, you know, kind of key
Josh:moves that allow us to be here today.
Brian:Yeah, I mean, 'cause that, that was when, you know, the Facebook
Brian:traffic hose got turned off and I think it became very clear then that
Brian:relying entirely on advertising is gonna be a very difficult proposition.
Josh:yeah.
Josh:Yeah.
Josh:Not, not workable at all.
Josh:And, and you know, it's funny that one of the, one of the things that I think
Josh:has always been, an advantage to, and just, just for kind of clarity, My, for
Josh:the first 20 years of the organization's history, I ran every aspect of, of
Josh:the business side of the organization.
Josh:Obviously I have people who, who work for me, but I mean, I was, you
Josh:know, the per, very
Josh:hands-on running each aspect of it.
Josh:And it's been a little different over the last five years or so.
Josh:Well.
Josh:More than a little different.
Josh:We, we now have a publisher who would, who, had worked
Josh:with me for a number of years.
Josh:I made him, you know, gave him the publisher job.
Josh:So basically, I, I'm, I'm less hands on today, and for the last four or five years
Josh:than I, than I was, previous to that.
Josh:but, I think a big advantage that we had is that if you are deep in
Josh:the nitty gritty of things like, you know, 20 14, 20 18 ERA programmatic
Josh:advertising, or for that, for that matter, 2005 ERA programmatic advertising.
Josh:You see things.
Josh:That you're not necessarily gonna see, you're certainly not gonna see if you're
Josh:the vast majority of journalists, but you're also not gonna see if
Josh:you're like, if you're most media executives because you're, you know,
Josh:third party or programmatic, you know, that's, that's not where the,
Josh:that's not where the stars are, right?
Josh:That's, that's not where the, where the,
Josh:big money is.
Josh:You're not looking really close.
Josh:So being hands-on in the business side and really in the trenches
Josh:also gives you some advantages.
Brian:What were you seeing then?
Brian:Because I mean, you.
Brian:I, I don't wanna say like turned against programmatic advertising or something,
Brian:but like, I mean, you, you, you sort of, you know, you made the choices that
Brian:you made and you saw that you, you saw that advertising was not the path to go
Brian:down and advertising was at the time the sort of, I guess that was the consensus,
Brian:sort of like the Washington consensus.
Brian:I mean, that was the consensus at the time.
Josh:Yeah.
Josh:Well, and as you say, the consensus also, you know, based on scale,
Josh:they all, they all go together.
Josh:I think that, you know, a few of those things were the way the, for
Josh:direct advertising, we were always in the DC advertising space, which
Josh:is a very unique, environment.
Brian:You mean like public affairs?
Josh:yes.
Josh:Which is in some ways it's a part of the advertising world.
Josh:That is it.
Josh:In effect kind of.
Josh:Yeah.
Josh:It's part of the lobbying budgets of corporate America basically.
Josh:So it's, so it's unique.
Josh:basically there were a number of ways where that was starting
Josh:to get very stratified, say in the first Obama administration.
Josh:Not because I'm just kind of, it had nothing to do with the
Josh:Obama administration, just
Josh:kind of lining it up with errors.
Josh:Became, very stratified.
Josh:And, at first we actually made a heavy pivot back to programmatic
Josh:advertising because I had, I had in the, let's say, in the 2000 5, 6, 7 era.
Josh:The whole thing in digital media was direct advertising and what
Josh:you didn't sell through direct advertising, you did through third
Josh:party advertising, you know, kind of,
Josh:uh, cash on, you know, exactly.
Josh:Just, just the leftovers.
Josh:They called it remnant,
Josh:you know, it's a good, a good sort of, capturing of that.
Josh:And since we were a fairly undercapitalized business.
Josh:I really and didn't have, you know, a kind of a big ad staff.
Josh:I spent a long time focusing on how can you, how can you slice and dice
Josh:the, the, the inventory so that you can get as high and effective ad. Rate
Josh:as possible through, through third party or programmatic advertising when
Josh:it was definitely a secondary thing.
Josh:And, you know, it's sort of like the way that, you know, homesteaders, right?
Josh:You kill the animal and you, you harvest every bit of it kind of
Josh:thing.
Josh:so in that era, I had really kind of gotten that down to a science,
Josh:getting, getting a. An effective ad rate that wouldn't mean much
Josh:to corporate publications, but at our, at our, you know, low cost
Josh:level was, was, was really good.
Josh:go forward, you know, half a dozen years.
Josh:So as we got into direct advertising, we kind of.
Josh:Devalued, third party advertising.
Josh:but I still knew a lot about how to do it.
Josh:So as part of that pivot, we actually pivoted heavily again
Josh:in that same period when we were starting our subscription business.
Josh:We actually pivot, pivoted heavily towards, towards third party because I
Josh:knew there was, there was a lot of money we could, we could recapture there.
Josh:and we did, you know, using a lot of the same ideas and stuff, but
Josh:in the same way, but as I did that, and we dramatically increased our
Josh:revenue, from third party advertising.
Josh:So those were, you know, it was, it was very successful, but you
Josh:could see also the same trends.
Josh:That we're hitting in direct advertising, we're hitting in third party advertising.
Josh:and a lot of that is just, concentration, you know, really basic things,
Josh:Concentration of the companies that, that operated in that, in that space.
Josh:The, the related, you know, takeover of the social networks basically.
Josh:and Google being sort of a hybrid, being a sort of a hybrid part of that.
Josh:So, you know, there was a, I would say in, You know, 20 12, 20 13, we
Josh:had, started making a lot of money again in third party advertising, but
Josh:it was also clear that it was dying even as we were increasing the money
Brian:Explain that.
Brian:What did you, why?
Brian:Why,
Josh:Well, could see that again.
Josh:reduction of players in the space, the increasing dominance of the platforms.
Josh:and as you know, in the same way that, that when it, when it,
Josh:when it basically bubbled down to everything going through Google.
Josh:The effective prices were gonna go down.
Josh:We know about this, this is
Josh:basic monopolies and so forth, but I remember, I remember a conversation
Josh:with my colleague, Joe Rezo, who, who is the publisher of TPM now, but at the
Josh:time, who I basically hired in large part to manage third party in the way
Josh:that I, the way that I'm describing.
Josh:Probably in sometime in 2013 or 2014 or something like that.
Josh:What I said is, look, here's the way to think about this.
Josh:There are still, third party programmatic networks coming into
Josh:this space with lots of VC money.
Josh:They are gonna lose that money.
Josh:Maybe a few of them, you know, standard
Josh:hockey stick.
Josh:Maybe, maybe one or two of those will succeed, but all of that money
Josh:is going to be burned in what is basically a dying media space.
Josh:Because Google's gonna take all this over, and our job is to, is to
Josh:harvest indirectly as much of that VC
Josh:money as we can because you, you would, you
Josh:would
Brian:like cheap Uber rides to the airport.
Brian:Get
Brian:Get 'em.
Brian:Get 'em while they're, while you have
Josh:Exactly.
Josh:And frankly, you could see it because you know you You have, say your effective rate
Josh:is, you know, a a dollar 50 per ad slot.
Josh:Right.
Josh:And each few months you get some new entrant with a bunch of VC money
Josh:come in and they're offering too.
Josh:'cause they need to buy up space.
Josh:They need, you know, they need market share.
Josh:Great.
Brian:Yeah.
Josh:it on.
Josh:Right.
Josh:And,
Brian:Trust me, I spent those years at Digiday.
Brian:I mean, like we, I would stand up on that stage and be like, and thank you to our
Brian:partners, and then it would be like one slide of logos and then another slide of
Brian:logos, and then another slide of logos.
Brian:I was like, I kept joking.
Brian:I was like, the Matthew McConaughey, like I keep getting older with the logos.
Brian:Just keep changing, like, you know.
Josh:yeah, yeah.
Josh:And, and, and again, I, you know, we were in, in a lot of ways what we were, what
Josh:we were doing in that period was again.
Josh:Harvesting the VC money, trying to buy market share in a, in an industry
Josh:space that was being devoured by the big social networks and Google.
Josh:And, and look, I, I don't wanna, obviously, it's not
Josh:that I had perfect visibility
Josh:into this, at the time, but we had basic visibility, into it.
Josh:And, And again, that, that was, that was, why I was so desperate to grow,
Josh:the subscription business because I, I mean, I, I didn't, there was a,
Josh:you know, I, I don't know, in the.
Josh:Once you get to around the pandemic and just after, I mean, the fact that it, it,
Josh:it bottomed out quite as much as it did.
Josh:I didn't expect it, you know, I didn't expect quite that, but I could see
Josh:it was, I could see it was dying.
Josh:Because again, if you, if you, we were one of the, we were one
Josh:of the beta slash launch partners of what was you, you'll know GAM
Josh:Google Ad Manager.
Josh:Right?
Josh:The, the, the,
Brian:successor to double click.
Josh:Yeah.
Josh:Yeah.
Josh:The, well, this was, well that was before Google Ad Managers,
Josh:before they bought Double Click
Josh:and then Google.
Josh:Yeah.
Josh:So, GAM, Google, Google Ad Manager
Josh:was
Brian:hands on.
Josh:Yeah.
Josh:Was the, was the, yeah, exactly.
Josh:Well, when you, when you, when you need to, when you need to cover payroll,
Josh:you gotta be hands on, right?
Josh:so yeah, so, so GAM was first, and then in pretty short order, they bought
Josh:double click, and that's where, you know,
Josh:double click, you know, became the in-house version of it.
Josh:but if you had, if you had, been there from the beginning of it and watched
Josh:how it evolved and how their role.
Josh:It evolved and as the dominant role of it, you, you see it happening.
Josh:Right.
Josh:And I, I remember, I, I, I wrote occasionally.
Josh:I, I've obviously most of what I write about is politics, but occasionally
Josh:I've written about the business of media
Brian:I like those.
Brian:I'm like, I like the politics stuff, but I'm like, okay, this
Brian:guy's getting the details too.
Brian:I'm reading.
Josh:you know, it's funny, I, I, in a lot of ways, I, in some ways I've,
Josh:I've
Brian:people who come to TPM looking for politics and all
Brian:of a sudden they're in gam.
Josh:Well, well, you know, it's funny that, that I, I have always, in a lot of
Josh:ways I've enjoyed that stuff more because in the politics space, you know, I think
Josh:about, well, there's a million people who know what I'm saying about, you know,
Josh:there's just, but, but there, there are.
Josh:Along the way, there were certain things about, the the digital media
Josh:infrastructure that I certainly wasn't the only one who knew about, but often
Josh:I was in this, in this somewhat unique, sorry, grammarian, somewhat unique
Josh:space in that I really did know the details and I could write about it.
Brian:Right, that's the D Like there's a lot of people that
Brian:know the details, but they're
Josh:exactly, exactly.
Josh:There's a lot of people in the, in that space who,
Brian:They almost know too many of the details 'cause they're not able to like
Brian:sort of see the forest for the trees.
Brian:A lot of times, you know, they
Josh:you know, it.
Brian:it's a plumber's convention arguing about PVC piping and whatnot,
Brian:and it's like, wait a second.
Josh:You know, it's funny, I actually had, there was one time, I don't know,
Josh:it was probably, two or three years before the pandemic, something like that.
Josh:And, a couple of the guys who, were, you know, very, very high up
Josh:people in the Google, programmatic advertising, double click.
Josh:Hive, right.
Josh:Who worked out of the, worked out of their New York space, and were
Josh:actually both TPM subscribers.
Josh:So these were, you know, these were kind of TPM people.
Josh:And I had written, a few pieces basically explaining Google's mono monopoly
Josh:power over the advertising space.
Brian:We can say that now.
Brian:It's a
Josh:yeah.
Josh:Yeah.
Josh:Now it's, now it's, it's a formal
Brian:I used to always say dominant, like, like all these sort of
Josh:exactly.
Josh:it's a formal, formal legal finding now.
Josh:and again, you know, as monopolists go, there's, you know, some monopolists,
Josh:get in by just some kind of.
Josh:Nasty acquisitions.
Josh:Google did it to a great extent by a lot of forward thinking and, and, and
Josh:really pretty effective products and all that kind of stuff.
Josh:Anyway, so I
Brian:with the greatest like economic engine ever created
Josh:of
Josh:course,
Brian:search,
Josh:yes.
Josh:yes.
Josh:But, so anyway, so I, I had written a couple pieces saying, you know,
Josh:here's, here's how it works.
Josh:Here's how,
Josh:here's the big sort of picture of this and these two guys, very
Josh:nice guys, you know, subscribers to the site, readers of the site.
Josh:Basically invited me to come in.
Josh:'cause like, you know, we're not, we're not monopolists, you know, it's,
Josh:it's not, it's not what you think.
Josh:and so, so I went over to meet with them and it's funny, I actually had
Josh:this, you know how they do, you go into a place like Google, you have
Josh:to basically sign an NDA to sign
Brian:Oh yeah, you have to say you're not from North Korea and Cuba and stuff.
Josh:All just, you know, and I will never divulge
Josh:anything I see in this building
Brian:I'm like, I would always do this a report.
Brian:I'm like, you gotta be kidding me.
Brian:I was like, I'll sign this thing.
Brian:I'm not gonna be some, you know, guy who lights himself on fire in
Brian:the lobby, but I'm not, I'm, I'm not
Josh:Well, I was one of those guys, right?
Josh:Because, but not in this, but the reason was, is that, you know, I
Josh:think most people are going to Google because there's a business deal
Josh:on the line and they need to, and I remember I saw the thing and I
Josh:was like, I'm not signing this.
Josh:And she's, well, you have to.
Josh:And I, and
Josh:I said, I'm happy to leave.
Josh:Your guys invited me here.
Josh:Like, whatever.
Josh:Anyway, I got in.
Josh:So, but the, but the reason I bring this up is we had a great conversation.
Josh:They kind of, you know.
Josh:Whatever, but he talked about seeing the forest for the trees.
Josh:I don't think they thought they were a monopoly.
Josh:These were people who were admirers of the website,
Josh:you know, knew me through reading about politics.
Josh:I don't think they were trying to spin me like, why do they care?
Josh:They don't care.
Josh:You
Brian:But it, it effectively doesn't really matter.
Brian:Also like, you know, it doesn't, it's like I think about this a lot of times
Brian:in the political world of the sort of people who used to be more traditional,
Brian:I guess conservatives who are now like deconstructing the kabbala or whatever.
Brian:I'm like, it doesn't really matter if they truly believe it or not, like,
Josh:yeah.
Josh:No, no, no.
Josh:Yeah,
Brian:incentives.
Brian:The end
Josh:to totally.
Josh:But I, but I, but to your point that, A lot of the big trends,
Josh:and this applies to all of us.
Josh:It's hard for, it's hard for any of us to see the big trends that we are
Josh:governed by and and, and part of, right.
Josh:so yeah, so all of those things were, all of those things were coming together
Josh:and we were in a period sort of in the last, you know, three or four years
Josh:before the pandemic, when we were.
Josh:Trying to build the membership business as quickly as possible
Josh:to manage the, the, you know,
Brian:Yeah.
Josh:catastrophic decline of the advertising business.
Josh:And, and it was, you know, I don't need to tell anybody in, in the space
Josh:at the time it was very difficult, but we did have this advantage.
Josh:We'd, we'd gotten a four or five year jump on the subscription
Josh:thing, and that's what saved us.
Brian:Okay, so now tell me about where subscription slash memberships are.
Brian:I mean, they're the overwhelming majority of the revenue, right?
Josh:I mean, they're,
Josh:they're.
Josh:Yeah, in the nine, in the 90, in the 90%, range.
Josh:So basically it's an entirely a subscription business.
Josh:we, you know, we still do, programmatic advertising, but it's, it's, you
Josh:know, it's a minor part of the minor part of the revenue picture.
Josh:In practice, it is a completely subscription driven business,
Brian:And that gives you more.
Josh:revenue sources.
Brian:Right.
Brian:That gives you more stability, right?
Brian:I mean, you, you know, I know as someone who relies on indirect for the
Brian:most part, like it's really not great.
Brian:You go into the year starting from zero.
Brian:I mean, you have partners that will renew.
Brian:I'm like rubbing my neck right now 'cause I'm in like, sort of renewal season.
Brian:But, it's, it's definitely, there's a lot of advantages to.
Josh:it's night and it is just on the, just on the.
Josh:Quality of life front, frankly.
Josh:I, I mean we, you know, say back in any time between like, you know, 2010 and
Josh:2015, you know, go into the, go into the year with a, with a, with a budget.
Josh:Having to bring in upwards of $3 million.
Josh:Right.
Josh:and, that would, that was basically all advertising.
Josh:Now, programmatic is somewhat predictable, right?
Josh:You have a general sense since it's a commodity business, but
Josh:basically go into the year.
Josh:Not knowing where, you know, with the payroll there, it's
Josh:a payroll business, right?
Josh:It's overwhelmingly payroll
Josh:and, and rent.
Josh:and, and not knowing where the money is coming from.
Josh:And the difference is there is that if you are a bigger publication, you maybe don't
Josh:have guarantees, but you have advertisers.
Josh:They may advertise more or less, but you have advertisers, a small
Josh:publication without an endemic advertising space, which we are.
Josh:We're not tech where you've got ga, you know, gadget advertising and stuff like
Josh:that.
Josh:You have no advertisers.
Josh:You don't have advertisers.
Josh:You may have people who advertise more than in more than one year,
Josh:but you don't have advertisers.
Josh:So you're basically having to, to, build an advertising book.
Josh:From scratch each year, and that was so damn stressful.
Josh:I can't, I can't, I, I can't, I can't even describe because again, I wasn't,
Josh:I wasn't an ad seller per se, but I was the one running our strategy and,
Josh:and all the stuff, and, and the thing with subscriptions is, and this is, you
Josh:know, look, this is, we know this is why the, you know, Everybody wants you to
Josh:put down for recurring monthly payment.
Josh:It's like having an annuity or something like that, right?
Josh:I mean, you go into, when you're a subscription based business, you go
Josh:into the year basically having almost total certainty of nine, where 90% of
Josh:the revenues coming from, and that's, believe me, that is so different from 0%
Brian:Yeah.
Josh:of the revenue.
Brian:Yeah.
Brian:at the same time, right, like, I mean, there's, there's a lower ceiling.
Brian:I.
Josh:Yes, absolutely.
Josh:Abso there is a lower ceiling.
Brian:I think all of these, these shifts are, are very good.
Brian:If you think about like just the, the blogging era, you know, it was
Brian:going to be, it was in the, you know, content must be free time and
Brian:very few people were behind paywall.
Brian:Even doing a paywall was extraordinarily difficult.
Brian:Technically,
Josh:Yeah, yeah, exactly.
Brian:not used to paying online even, but much less for paying for content.
Josh:And they're also beyond, beyond pay, beyond the, the mechanics of a paywall,
Josh:even the mechanics of how you would.
Josh:Harvest subscription payments was,
Brian:was no stripe,
Josh:yeah.
Josh:There was no, and, and the, you know, the other part that's, that's, that is worth,
Josh:kind of making clear for people who, who weren't, you know, kind of in the mix at
Josh:this time, is that for most of what people consider like the blogging era, there was
Josh:no, there was no business model at all.
Josh:There were people asking for tips, at a certain point,
Josh:blog ads, which was a specific
Josh:company which really kind of pioneered,
Josh:um, the kind of Oh, yeah.
Josh:Oh yeah.
Josh:You know, that was a big part of the early, period for us, but I, I guess
Josh:it's, it's, it, it's important to realize that, again, this sort of what
Josh:people remember as the, as the height of
Josh:the blogging era
Brian:was no business model.
Brian:People didn't
Brian:think about it.
Brian:It was a hobbyist, it was CB radio, in many ways.
Brian:And then, you know, Nick Denton was sandbagging it all the time
Brian:saying, this is no business.
Brian:This is no business.
Brian:While he was building business,
Josh:Yeah.
Josh:He, you know, Nick always used to, I remember used, he always used to have
Josh:this line about anything, you know, in anything we do that, that, you know.
Josh:Might be called journalism.
Josh:You tell me and I'll get rid of it.
Josh:You know, Nick is a,
Josh:is a, a provocative and transgressive guy.
Josh:but yes, it was all, it was all without a business model.
Josh:And, and, you know, Henry Cope, Copeland had a big role in kind of making it,
Josh:opening up one, you know, one real revenue stream, which was a, which was a big deal.
Brian:So compare it to today where, you know, the energy, I think during the
Brian:pandemic particularly shifted to like Substack and I think Substack is a, you
Brian:know, it's an important company, right?
Brian:Like it far beyond, its like revenue and business itself.
Brian:In that it has created an entirely different, digital
Brian:economy for content that is.
Brian:Primarily direct payments from its audience.
Brian:Now
Brian:it doesn't only, there's Beehiiv, there's just sponsoring this podcast.
Brian:There's other places that you can do these, these things now.
Brian:But, you know, I think when I think of TPM, if it was going to
Brian:start 20 years later, it would probably start as a substack, right?
Josh:yeah, no, it absolutely, I mean, there's a lot of things like, you know.
Josh:Since we started doing a lot of things before, there were good
Josh:industry solutions for them.
Josh:We built a lot of things ourselves.
Josh:and so there are certain things that if you were starting now and you say, okay,
Josh:you know, we gotta 20% off the top for, you know, for the provider and all, you
Josh:know, all, all these kind of things, you know, we can't do that because we
Josh:already, we already own that money.
Josh:And so,
Josh:you know, when you're talk, when you're talking about, You
Josh:know, X millions of dollars of.
Josh:Revenue.
Josh:You, you can't really do that.
Josh:But yes, that would be, that would totally be the way that we do it.
Josh:We even have a couple of our newsletters, a semi on Substack.
Josh:They're still completely within the TPM ecosystem, but we also, do
Josh:versions of them on Substack to take some of their, you know, their finding
Josh:algorithms and stuff is a, a place to be.
Josh:So we even dabble with it, even though we don't, we don't, you know, all of our,
Josh:you know, kind of business fulfillment stuff is based on our own software.
Josh:You know, often built
Josh:on, on public libraries and stuff, but not, we don't, we don't
Josh:deal with any of the, any of the companies that will basically.
Josh:you know, provide a subscription, you know, the, the sort of
Josh:the, the, the back office of a subscription service as a, as, as,
Josh:a, as service to you.
Josh:But yeah, we absolutely would.
Josh:And, and, you know, the other part that's important to say is that the,
Josh:you know, the arrival of Substack is.
Josh:Partly because they have this great finding algorithm that allows people to,
Josh:you know, to find you and stuff like that.
Josh:And they've really, gotten the business fulfillment side
Josh:down really well at a relatively, you know, a relatively, easy percentage.
Josh:but the other flip side of it is everything we were just talking
Josh:about, about the collapse of digital journalism between like 2015 and 2020.
Josh:You've got lots of journalists who've decided that, it, it is the
Josh:preferable thing to, to, you know, put out their own shingle and be
Josh:like busking or not quite busking.
Josh:You know, there's everything from people who are just doing it kind of individually
Josh:to what, you know, the free press and, and some of the tech substack do.
Josh:but you know, it's, it, not everybody wants to do that.
Josh:So some of it is of necess.
Josh:I mean, a lot of it is of necessity,
Brian:Yeah, a lot of reluctant entrepreneurs out there.
Josh:Yeah.
Josh:Yeah.
Josh:And, and that is, you know, it's funny, I remember there's
Josh:a, a New Yorker journalist.
Josh:I, I, I remember just a lunch we had, I don't know, a decade
Josh:ago or something like that.
Josh:And this is a very successful journalist, right?
Josh:Would be, you know, a very prominent and saying like, I don't know how you do it.
Josh:I just want a paycheck.
Josh:I don't wanna worry about all
Josh:that crap.
Josh:Right.
Josh:And, you know, people are character logically different, but the, but the,
Josh:the crisis in the industry, you know, forced a lot of character, logically
Josh:different people to say like, I, this
Brian:Well also the, the
Josh:is what I'm gonna do this.
Brian:the risk profile flipped almost, right?
Brian:Like, I mean, like it used to be it's higher risk to be like independent.
Brian:It absolutely like is in some ways.
Brian:But then like, do you wanna be sitting at CBS news right now?
Brian:I mean, that's pretty high risk.
Brian:They got, they got 2000 scalps.
Brian:They're gonna like take.
Josh:Yep,
Brian:so, you know, this industry has compressed quite a bit, but
Brian:like, tell me about like the sort of substack ification, if you will, of
Brian:politics, like in particular in your, in your space, because there are tons.
Brian:Now of independent voices, journalists, non journalists, comedians, I, you know,
Brian:I get most of my Middle East news from comedians, it seems like these days.
Brian:You know, comic Dave Smith tells me what's going on.
Josh:you know, there, there's, there's always been this, this, this pattern
Josh:that we have existed in with, with other players becoming more like us.
Josh:And I think that this was a lot of our, this was a big thing
Josh:that we dealt with, say between, you know, the, the 2000 6, 7, 8.
Josh:period to, you know, to a decade later that there was a certain point when the
Josh:big news organizations were still in some cases, still at once a day publication
Josh:or still operating totally in the, you know, kind of, high school journalism
Josh:class idea of what a newspaper article is.
Josh:And we could just kind of.
Josh:Run circles around those people.
Josh:And now we were still like a tiny little organization, but in the
Josh:sense of for people who wanted for news, for political news junkies who
Josh:wanted to know what was happening.
Josh:Now we had these formats that we worked in that we not, we obviously
Josh:weren't, you know, doing kind of, one publication a day, but able to,
Josh:customize our mode of publication.
Josh:To the content, sometimes two sentences is the news, and can you front two sentences
Josh:that you're not locked into an article?
Josh:this is look, an easy way of explaining this is the way that it is, that it is
Josh:totally natural to us now to know that the Times and the Post and all the other
Josh:similar organizations will have live blogs
Josh:of all sorts of, of moving stories.
Josh:That didn't used to be the case, and that's certainly not.
Josh:Just a matter of, of copying us, literally copying us, but a little,
Josh:you know, we started a, you know, we're, we're in the group of
Josh:publications that started those things.
Josh:So you have to, you have to get used to like, oh,
Brian:Yeah,
Josh:we're not the only ones doing
Brian:there's no moats.
Brian:There are
Josh:Yeah, exactly.
Brian:not a moat.
Brian:Like it's like, oh, that looks good.
Brian:I'm gonna do that.
Josh:Exactly, exactly.
Josh:so you have things like that and, and, so now we are.
Josh:We are in a space where a lot of, a lot of people who used to work for the big
Josh:publications are setting up shop, you know, places like, you know, the Bulwark
Josh:has a little different since their founding people were mainly people out
Josh:of politics as opposed to journalism.
Josh:But I, they've obviously hired up a lot of journalism now,
Josh:all sorts of places like this.
Josh:So, so there are a lot of, you know, we are not that unique as a, as an
Josh:organization of around 20 people.
Josh:You know, doing this stuff.
Josh:And that's, you know, that's how media works and that's great as far as I'm
Josh:concerned because we have, we have an audience that likes what we do.
Josh:And I can honestly say that, that, that our business is more, robust
Josh:and stable than it's ever been.
Josh:not just, you know, so not just surviving as you say.
Josh:It's not, we're not gonna have hockey stick growth.
Josh:Right.
Josh:This is the size of the business.
Josh:but a lot of the people who had hockey stick growth didn't realize that they
Josh:weren't actually having hockey stick
Josh:growth.
Josh:It was kind of an illusion, and there were very specific reasons
Josh:why, why we did not get in on that very aggressive, VC backed period.
Josh:It was a decision I made.
Josh:not, and not one 'cause like, oh, you know, journalism needs to remain pure.
Josh:I, there, there was, there was, you know, TPM was a hot thing
Josh:at the time when that money was flooding in.
Josh:And, at a certain point I was, it wasn't even a matter of, I had to be persuaded.
Josh:I was so.
Josh:I was so busy running things that I actually had a number of sort of prominent
Josh:Silicon Valley VCs trying to get in touch with me and that other people that I just,
Josh:I can't even explain to myself, now, like, why didn't I respond to these people?
Josh:And it
Brian:Well, you could just say that you were wise.
Josh:You know, well,
Josh:I got wise a little later at that, at, at that point, I wasn't wise though.
Josh:I was just, I was just so, I was just so full on doing it.
Josh:day after day.
Josh:In any case, what happened was eventually I got persuaded like,
Josh:all right, you should do, you take some investment money, whatever.
Josh:And one of the things I've always been very happy about
Josh:is that I, as I was, as I was.
Josh:Walking through how these deals would work and stuff, I realized very
Josh:quickly all the ways that you can lose control of a company while still
Josh:being the majority owner of a company.
Josh:And for reasons that are just characterological, I
Josh:could never accept that.
Josh:I couldn't handle the idea that someone could, could take the company
Josh:away from me.
Brian:and it's, it's, it's kind of like hard to like.
Brian:Looking back, but I mean, that was the sort of default for a lot
Brian:of people who reached like, you know, the, you, you, you, like you
Brian:said, you were like a hot property.
Brian:Whereas I feel like now it's normalized, you know, bootstrapping
Brian:is the assumption in media.
Brian:Like,
Brian:I don't think nobody's like out there like raising money for the most part,
Josh:Yeah.
Josh:Why would you?
Brian:sites.
Brian:It's like, get to.
Brian:You know, particularly you, you can do, and you look at like, I think particularly
Brian:in the political landscape, like there's some really profitable, like small
Brian:and particularly around personalities.
Brian:Now they don't have a ton of, of enterprise value, right?
Brian:But like amazing businesses.
Josh:for you in the, if you're, if you're running it, it's, it's,
Josh:I, look, I've been, I've been, you know, in, in incredibly fortunate
Josh:with, with, with TPM, it's great.
Josh:It's, it's, it's doing well.
Josh:You know, I did a, we, we have this, We are publishing this 25th
Josh:anniversary series where we basically went to 25 people in every kind of
Josh:part of the digital media history in present and just say, what's, what's
Josh:an essay about the hist, about the last 25 years of digital media that
Josh:you're sort of itching to write?
Josh:And we commissioned all those, and
Josh:I wrote an introduction for it and the sort of the after sort of thanking
Josh:everybody and all that kind of stuff.
Josh:I said the, the, the, the original sin of digital media.
Brian:there are many since I read it, but
Josh:Well, okay.
Josh:Yeah.
Josh:Well, there's, this is the, the, the, the core one in
Josh:my Yeah, you're absolutely right.
Josh:There is, there is one is that people thought digital media was part of the tech
Josh:industry.
Josh:That it was, that it was tech and it was not.
Josh:and when you talk about moats, you know, this is, this is, this is very basic
Josh:for anybody who, who knows, Silicon Valley or VCs or tech world, you, know,
Josh:you, you, you you intentionally blow a lot of money fast because you're trying
Josh:to build scale and network effects and lock in and you know, let alone losing
Josh:nine out of 10, you can lose 19 out of 20 and you get locked in, you are
Josh:gonna make all your money back.
Josh:That's the whole game.
Josh:And there was this weird.
Josh:inability to see that there, there are no network effects in news.
Josh:There are certain,
Josh:certain little parts of news distribution that have network effects, but
Josh:publications have no network effects.
Josh:You're not gonna be the stripe of news and suddenly like, wow,
Josh:I, you know, it's so big now.
Josh:You can't not get your news from Stripe.
Josh:That makes no sense and a huge, huge amount of, of, of everything that
Josh:happened and the whole collapse was, was that playing out and you had, you
Josh:know, added to the fact that the whole, the whole, the whole business model
Josh:was sort of destroyed by the, by the, you know, concentration of, of the.
Josh:Of the tech you know, platform monopolies.
Josh:but that's another thing that again, sort of allowed us some
Josh:visibility is that if you were running a media business, and, and
Josh:had a really hands-on sense of how the money worked, you could see that
Josh:all of these hotshot publications of a decade ago were not making money.
Josh:You just, you, you know the space.
Josh:You look at, you look at the numbers and you say like, you're, obviously, you,
Josh:you're, you're telling, you know, you're not gonna fool Morrissey, but you're
Josh:gonna fool half the other people in the media press that you're, that you're
Josh:making money, you're not making money.
Josh:You know, you may have some sort of Wall Street creative,
Josh:creative accounting and stuff.
Brian:Community adjusted ebitda.
Josh:Yeah, all these kind, you know, it's funny, I was telling something recently.
Josh:They talk about, you know, the, the fact that you're in a space where
Josh:there's a difference between are you solvent and are you cash flow positive?
Josh:You're not, you know, I, for those listeners, I know, I know accounting,
Josh:I know the difference.
Josh:But in practice, in this business where there is no, inventory, where
Josh:there is, there is very little, intellectual property that, that,
Josh:that can, can be done anything with.
Josh:if you are not cashflow positive, you are, there's someone who's
Josh:fooling you about your job security.
Brian:So let me, let me ask you this then the final topic, but it's a
Brian:little bit like broad, but I have this theory about like, we're operating
Brian:in the information space, right?
Brian:And it's, there's, the media industry is, is a small part of a larger.
Brian:Space in which everyone's jostling for attention,
Josh:Mm-hmm.
Brian:and people have different business models Talking point talking points.
Brian:USA to me or talking points, what am I saying?
Brian:Turning point USA was was a media organization
Josh:Mm-hmm.
Brian:purpose about it.
Brian:And we have that.
Brian:All across this information space.
Brian:a lot of the energy seems to be in personalities, in creators, like,
Brian:and there's no moat really in media.
Brian:I think we've gone through this at this point.
Brian:and so I think you end up.
Brian:Defaulting to personality because you know, you have different,
Brian:different personalities and you can develop a parasocial bond.
Brian:And we've seen that, within the, the, the contours of the information
Brian:space that, that is rewarded.
Brian:Is this do, first of all, how do you, we evaluate that and then is,
Brian:is that like a permanent condition as we move beyond mass media?
Josh:Right.
Josh:It's a good question.
Josh:I, I, you know, you're, you're, you're, you're catching me before
Josh:I say I, I knew everything in retrospect because I, I don't have a,
Josh:I don't have a clear sense of that.
Josh:You know, I, I think if we look at, if we, well, let's look.
Josh:There is.
Josh:We have a lot of things that have happened just in the last six months.
Josh:That point to a, a lot of media concentration that is, that is,
Josh:you know, kind of tied to the government and stuff like that.
Josh:So there may be forms of lock in there that we're, that we're already seeing.
Josh:I think that, I, I could see us being in this space, the sort of the influencer
Josh:personal connection space for a long time.
Josh:I think if we look at the broad scope of history that you, you, society
Josh:and economies, work their way into somewhat stable, institutionally stable
Josh:moments, but we're certainly not.
Josh:we're not there yet.
Josh:it could also be, you know, it, it could be something that our society is still,
Josh:you know, it could be something about the internet, the sort of the parasocial
Josh:intimacy that is, that is, Seems to go naturally with the internet that maybe
Josh:you are going to have something.
Josh:I will, I will say this, that, you know, we're all talking
Josh:about, how AI will affect media.
Josh:Will, you know, will, will, will, dis intermediate
Josh:journalists and stuff like that.
Josh:And I do think that there's, there's a pretty big contradiction here because
Josh:the entire coin of the realm about.
Josh:Influencers and parasocial relationships is about a person.
Josh:It's about a person.
Josh:that is, I do you, you can fool someone.
Josh:You know, you could, you could, you could have a,
Josh:an influencer using AI to, to produce their stuff.
Josh:but this is something that I have, I've given a lot of thought to,
Josh:partly because I'm in this business.
Josh:I doubt just generationally whether, whether it'll affect me a lot
Josh:personally, but like, you know, will, will serious news coverage
Josh:and let me amend that a little bit.
Josh:Very straightforward wire stuff I could see being done by ai
Josh:and, and that's very important stuff.
Josh:It just, it's different, it's very kind of specific and factual, but,
Josh:people doing opinion journalism.
Brian:What it means.
Brian:Connecting the dots.
Brian:Yeah.
Josh:think there was a lot about the era of major metropolitan
Josh:newspapers that we did not understand until the internet destroyed.
Josh:And I think there is something similar about the re potential relationship
Josh:between AI and journalism, and I think the key is that even though
Josh:we haven't had to think about it, if you read opinion pieces, it is only
Josh:relevant or compelling to you because the idea that a another person.
Josh:An entity like fundamentally, like you, a human being,
Josh:came up with these ideas and wrestled with them.
Josh:If it is by a machine, I don't think the vast majority of people
Josh:will be interested to read it.
Josh:That's not to say that AI couldn't fool a lot of people or fool some
Josh:people into thinking a person did it.
Josh:But the idea.
Josh:I think people only want to read that kind of journalism if it
Josh:originates with a human being.
Josh:so, and I, I,
Brian:Yeah.
Brian:And that, that would argue that this would accelerate and would be something of emo
Brian:like that would be because like the, the.
Brian:Just the humanity of it would then be the differentiator.
Brian:And you can't give up your differentiator.
Brian:And that's why I sort of, you know, I think, look, there's a lot of pressure on
Brian:the news industry to get more efficient
Brian:and AI is a
Josh:Mm-hmm.
Josh:Mm-hmm.
Brian:et cetera.
Brian:at the same
Brian:time, you can't give up like your, your strength.
Brian:And maybe this is me sort of whistling by the
Josh:No, I, I, I think, I think that is true.
Josh:I mean, I was thinking of moats in different ways.
Josh:There's, there's, there's moats for the influencer era,
Josh:and I think there is a moat there.
Josh:the, the, the, the moat for individual companies, that's
Josh:different because obviously individual influencers, come and go.
Josh:But no, I, I, I do think, I do think that is the case.
Josh:I think people want to hear what another person, thinks.
Josh:And the more creative that person is, the more whatever, the more kind of attractive
Josh:they are as someone, as someone to read.
Josh:But I think even for listeners, think about yourself.
Josh:Think about if you, if wherever you read your opinion, journalism,
Josh:if it's, you know, the Time's Up ed page or, or your favorite site.
Josh:If you read something knowing that it was something produced by an algorithm,
Josh:you know, produced by ai, would you be interested in what it had to say?
Josh:And I don't think most people would.
Josh:So I do think that is,
Brian:Yeah, I think the big, the big unknown is, and we could
Brian:go on this forever, we could do one of those four hour podcasts.
Brian:I think the big unknown is whether that generationally changes,
Brian:like we're too far into it.
Brian:Like we grew up like analog.
Brian:I mean, all, all the internet stuff is
Josh:My, my, my bet is that it doesn't, that it is something that
Josh:is something actually fundamental to, to, to why we read, why we
Josh:consume, why we consume things.
Josh:But yeah, we,
Brian:Well that's assuming people are gonna be reading.
Josh:Well, why you consume, why you, why you consume well, why you
Josh:read, why you listen to podcasts.
Josh:You
Josh:know, podcasts is another example.
Josh:You could, obviously, you could, you could certainly engineer
Josh:a podcast with, with ai.
Josh:Would you want to hear it?
Josh:But it's also true that would, it's very hard for us to, to, for
Josh:any humans to think beyond their generational, you know, beyond
Josh:their generation, beyond their time.
Brian:Okay.
Brian:Awesome.
Brian:Thank you so much, Josh.
Brian:This was, uh, really great.
Brian:Congrats
Josh:really appreciate it.
Josh:I had a great time.
Josh:Thank you.
Josh:Thank you so much.